
City University
It has been a couple of days now until I’ve been able to isolate the necessary, dual requirements of spare time and a co-operating computer in order to blog. This has not been for no meagre reason, however, as I’ve been really quite busy.
I had an interview last Thursday with the Guardian’s Scott Trust at City University, to see if they would grant me a bursary to do my masters degree in September.
The interview was exceptionally gruelling. There was a friendly woman from the Scott Trust (who was the nicest of the lot), a Guardian journalist and the City University course leader on the panel. There was no holding back when it came to the asking of difficult questions, and the panel doggedly pushed further and further, not taking any answer without asking yet a further probing question.
They asked me why I wanted to become a journalist. That was easy enough:
- To stay in touch with society, art, culture and current affairs. The fast changing world around me.
- To have a hand in how others percieve the fast changing world around them – for the better. To make sure that the communication of information is not skewed to cast favourably those who should not be cast in a favourable light. To quote Lord Reith: to ‘inform, edcuate and to entertain’.
Though after that, it became harder. These generalised ideals were squeezed down to the practicalities of working as a low paid journalist; being responsible for a smaller, arguably less worthy, audience.
I reacted in the way I knew was right. What they wanted to hear, yet also what I believed (within reason). I told the panel that I would work for a low paid local publication because I was realistic that it is difficult to break into the nationals; though that I would enjoy such a role all the same, as journalism was my passion.
The questions then moved to current affairs. I felt I spoke well on the news agendas of the day, though obviously not as admirably as a fully fledged Guardian journalist would demand.
He asked me what agendas I would push. Though not having the same channels of information, contacts and day-to-day awareness of what is, and what isn’t, a good agenda and a good angle to push, as he did, I struggled somewhat.
I just hope they were being particularly harsh with those questions, though admired my current affairs knowledge and appreciated the fact that I really was ‘on the spot’.
After what was perhaps twenty minutes I was finally allowed to go, with my nerves feeling utterly shot. The Scott Trust co-ordinater told me I had ‘done well’ – though whether they were looking for someone who did exceptionally well remains to be seen. I won’t find out until late May whether I get it.
And god knows, I need it. They would pay for my fees and give me a subsistence fund on top. Without it I’ll be going cap in hand to the bank, begging with them to let me have a career development loan. Dire straits indeed.
After the interview I went by tube to meet some friends in east London. There was a man who coughed at one point. Not the done thing during the time of swine flu. It was funny to see the poor mans face curl up with embarresment and to see the worried looks of those sat nearest to the infected individual.
There was probably nothing wrong with the man, though in a time of moral panic, us Brits certainly don’t know how to cope with any potential outsiders.
In all, this trip shows up the harsh realities of the capital. Am I going to make it in a city where you get a grilling like you’ll never believe? Or will I be made an outcast for having a sneeze?
It remains to be seen.